Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy: Timing, Adverse Events, and Coordination of Care (Part 2)
Welcome to this Clinical Case Series learning module!
Here's how it works:
- Read these 3 case studies on the AP role in managing patients heavily pretreated for multiple myeloma as they receive CAR T-Cell therapy. But don't miss the 3 other cases that make up part 1 of this module.
- Answer the poll next to each case to see how your colleagues are managing these patients. You'll see results in real time.
- Continue your learning by watching a recording of a webinar presented by Rebecca Lu, MSN, RN, FNP-C
Ensuring Coordination of Care and Care Continuity in CAR T-Cell Therapy
Clinical Pearl: Clear communication and thorough understanding of post CAR T-cell therapy recovery is essential for seamless continuation of care between care teams.
Mr. Norton is a 61-year-old male who is status post ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) infusion and was discharged from the hospital on day 10. His hospital course was unremarkable except for severe nausea and vomiting from the lymphodepletion agents, which improved with as-needed ondansetron and olanzapine. His discharge instructions included twice weekly clinic visits for monitoring. During each visit, the advanced practice provider (APP) assessed him for any evidence of delayed cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity and evaluated his labs in the event he required any blood products or growth factors. She also reviewed his medications to ensure he was taking the appropriate prophylactics. By day 30, Mr. Norton was cleared to return to the care of his local oncology team. The APP drafted a letter that detailed the patient’s clinical course, along with five key points for continuity of care:
- The APP noted the date of Mr. Norton’s CAR T-cell therapy and measure of response at day 30, which was a complete response.
- The APP noted Mr. Norton’s blood counts. Because it is not unusual to develop prolonged or delayed cytopenias several weeks and even months after treatment, she recommended the following:
- Check labs every 14 days
- Transfuse for hemoglobin < 8 g/dL and platelets < 10 K/μL
- Administer growth factors as needed for neutropenia
- The APP recommended administering IVIG for hypogammaglobulinemia or if Mr. Norton develops frequent respiratory infections in the presence of hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 400 mg/dL). CAR T cells can deplete normal mature B cells and plasma cells, which can result in hypogammaglobulinemia. This condition can increase the patient’s risk for infection and hospitalization.1 Mr. Norton’s most recent IgG level was 700 mg/dL on day 30.
- The APP recommended that Mr. Norton continue Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis for at least 1 year post–CAR T-cell therapy and until his CD4 counts are > 200 cells/μL. He has been receiving pentamidine intravenously every 3 weeks for this, but because his creatinine is stable, the local oncologist may consider transitioning his treatment to Bactrim three times per week instead. Mr. Norton should also continue his antiviral prophylaxis of valacyclovir for at least 1 year post–CAR T-cell therapy. If he develops persistent neutropenia, he should restart bacterial prophylaxis with levofloxacin and antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole until his neutrophils recover without growth factor support.
- The APP discouraged the administration of live vaccines but did advise that the patient receive the seasonal flu vaccine and COVID vaccine at least 3 months post–CAR T-cell therapy.
On day 35, Mr. Norton developed growth factor–dependent neutropenia. The local oncologist called the APP and they agreed that the patient should start filgrastim-sndz for neutropenia, levofloxacin for bacterial prophylaxis, and fluconazole for fungal prophylaxis. Mr. Norton did not have a scheduled time to return to the clinic where he received the CAR T-cell treatment, but the local oncologist could always refer back for any issues.
References
- Wat J, Barmettler S. Hypogammaglobulinemia after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: Characteristics, management, and future directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022;10:460-466.
Monitoring of Infectious Disease After CAR T-Cell Therapy
Clinical Pearl: Close monitoring of patients in the immediate post–CAR T-cell therapy setting is imperative for appropriate management of prophylaxis, as a patient may develop delayed/recurrent cytopenias.
Mrs. Hernandez is a 71-year-old female diagnosed with multiple myeloma who received idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) for relapsed/refractory disease. By day 3, she developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade 1, which continued through day 4 when she was found to have immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) grade 1 with immune effector cell (ICE) score 8/10. She was treated with IV tocilizumab 8 mg/kg and dexamethasone 10 mg. CRS and ICANS resolved on day 5. Due to febrile neutropenia, Mrs. Hernandez had an infectious disease workup and was started on empiric IV antibiotics of vancomycin and cefepime. Blood culture, urine culture, and chest x-ray were negative. She was given growth colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) starting on day 3 to keep her absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1, and her hemoglobin and platelets were transfused as needed. She was discharged in stable condition on day 8 with biweekly follow-up with the advanced practice provider (APP) for count checks.
Units | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBC | K/μL | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 5 |
Hemoglobin | g/dL | 8.7 | 9 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 8 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 9 |
Platelets | K/μL | 77 | 55 | 35 | 28 | 27 | 17 | 12 | 24 |
ANC | K/μL | 0.54 | 1.22 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.83 | 2.74 |
CMV quant PCR | ND | ||||||||
HHV6 | ND |
Day 9
Mrs. Hernandez presented to the outpatient clinic constitutionally well without any complaints. Her counts were sufficient without indication for replacement. The APP reviewed her prophylactic medications and instructed her to continue:
- Valacyclovir 500 mg orally daily for up to a year for viral prophylaxis
- Pentamidine IV 4 mg/kg every 21 days for up to a year and until CD4 counts are > 200 cells/μL for PJP prophylaxis
- Levetiracetam 500 mg orally daily until day 30, when she will taper to 500 mg daily for 3 days then stop
- Levaquin 500 mg daily until day 14 for bacterial prophylaxis
- Fluconazole 200 mg PO daily until day 14 for fungal prophylaxis so long as her ANC remains > 1 without G-CSF support
Day 14
Mrs. Hernandez returned for monitoring and was noted to have cytopenias and concern for cytomegalovirus (CMV). She received one dose of filgrastim-sndz, and due to persistent replacement dependent neutropenia, her levofloxacin and fluconazole were renewed for 7 more days.
Day 17
She remained asymptomatic, and her ANC improved without needing further GCSF. Levaquin and fluconazole were discontinued.
Day 21
She was more cytopenic, necessitating a dose of G-CSF and platelet transfusion. Levofloxacin and fluconazole were restarted. She was seen by infectious disease due to rising CMV levels and started on maribavir 400 mg daily. She was instructed to continue fluconazole, but should the neutropenia persist, her regimen could be changed to posaconazole 300 mg daily, which would have mold coverage.
Day 24
She was noted to have a nice neutrophil recovery.
Day 28
She became neutropenic again and required another dose of G-CSF. Levofloxacin and fluconazole scripts were extended.
Day 35
She was noted to have normalization of neutrophil counts.
Day 42
Her neutrophil counts remained normal without G-CSF support, and levofloxacin and fluconazole were stopped.
Units | Day 9 | Day 10 | Day 14 | Day 17 | Day 21 | Day 24 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBC | K/μL | 5.8 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 6.5 |
Hgb | g/dL | 9.5 | 9.7 | 9.2 | 9 | 8.5 | 7.6 | 9.6 | 9 | 8.6 |
Platelets | K/μL | 40 | 33 | 31 | 32 | 14 | 28 | 25 | 55 | 55 |
ANC | K/μL | 3.5 | 3.6 | 0.65 | 1.83 | 0.51 | 2.03 | 0.63 | 1.2 | 4.3 |
CMV quant PCR | --- | 122 | 144 | 880 | 1450 | 3700 | 990 | 143 | 70 | |
HHV6 | ND | ND | ND |
Managing Neurotoxicity Associated With CAR T-Cell Therapy
Clinical Pearl: Prompt identification and treatment of neurotoxicity leads to improved outcomes for patients with ICANS.
Mrs. Barnett is a 56-year-old female with multiple myeloma that was diagnosed in 2015. She underwent several lines of therapy including a clinical trial with bispecific antibody. She was found to have progressive disease with new and increased FDG avid lesions and was considered for ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). She was admitted for CAR T-cell infusion and was started on valganciclovir for history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia.
Her hospital course was unremarkable except for close CMV monitoring. The presence of CMV levels was determined to be related to low blood counts. She was discharged on day 10 in stable condition but was readmitted to the hospital on day 13 for fever. She was determined to have grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and was started on empiric antibiotics. Notably, her C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin increased, supporting CRS. CT of the head showed a new subcortical hypodensity in the left posterior temporal lobe. MRI of the brain showed vasogenic edema in the left occipital lobe without enhancing lesions. Mrs. Barnett was thought to have posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), and the advanced practice provider consulted neuro-oncology. She did not have any neurologic symptoms. Her immune effector cell (ICE) score was 10/10, but because she had presence of vasogenic edema, her immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) score was 3. She was treated with one dose of IV tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously for treatment of CRS and IV dexamethasone 10 mg for treatment of ICANS. Her CRS resolved on day 14. She was monitored closely for worsening neurologic symptoms.
On day 18, she was noted to have parkinsonism-type symptoms with apraxia and cogwheel rigidity of her right wrist. Her ICE score remained 10/10. She was treated with high-dose vitamin C and E for neuroprotection. Repeat MRI of the brain showed improvement in the cerebral edema, which resulted in resolution of ICANS. Her neurologic symptoms were treated with daily dexamethasone 10 mg, and the symptoms persisted until day 20 when she was discharged. At that time, neuro-oncology instituted a steroid taper so long as her symptoms did not return. She was discharged in stable condition and with resolution of neurologic symptoms.
Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 10 | Day 13 | Day 17 | Day 20 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMV quant PCR | 72.2 | <34.5 | <34.5 | ND | ND | --- | |
CRP | mg/L | 9.21 | 46.2 | 15.65 | 182.42 | 32.7 | 2.3 |
Ferritin | ng/mL | 1080 | 1261 | 1503 | 5893 | 3962 | 2673 |
Meet the Faculty
Rebecca Lu
MSN, RN, FNP-C
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Rebecca Lu, MSN, RN, FNP-C, is a nurse practitioner in the Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma and Supervisor Advanced Practice Provider in Myeloma Research at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. She previously served as team lead research NP and myeloma outpatient advanced practice NP. She has authored several peer-reviewed publications and presented at myriad professional conferences on multiple myeloma research. Ms. Lu is also a member of the International Myeloma Foundation Nurse Leadership Board and the American Association of Nurse Practitioners.
Let us know what you'd like to learn more about at jadpro-editor@broadcastmed.com